AIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 17.57%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 44.31%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $227.46 which suggests that it could grow by 13.65%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

AAR has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 33.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.74x versus 4.79x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 16.3%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.66%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 44.31%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.02%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Heico.

AAR has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.865%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1B. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Heico's net income of $168M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while Heico's PE ratio is 52.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.74x versus 7.42x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 2.83%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 44.31%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.76 which suggests that it could grow by 17.25%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

AAR has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.74x versus 1.50x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 4.63%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 44.31%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.22 which suggests that it could fall by -12.31%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Triumph Group.

AAR has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.444% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.942%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are larger than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $315.6M. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 3.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.74x versus 1.58x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.